What Does It Mean to Celebrate?

Reflections on Yom Ha’atzmaut in a Fractured Time

Yom Ha’atzmaut is here.

And I am not sure what to do with it this year.

I suspect I am not alone.

Some of us will celebrate with a brightness that feels slightly forced. Others will scroll past the blue-and-white posts on our feeds, unable to summon joy. Some will feel that celebrating at all is a kind of moral surrender — a looking away from things that cannot be ignored.

If any of this describes you, I want to be clear: your discomfort is not disloyalty. It shows how seriously you take what Israel was meant to be.

And if you find yourself in a different place from other Jews you love, people struggling just as honestly from the other direction, that too is part of this moment. There may not be a single right way to stand before this day, but there is a Jewish way to wrestle with it.

The Text We Keep Forgetting

I want to go back to May 14, 1948.

Not to the military maps or the political negotiations. To the document. To the words the founders actually chose when they had the chance to speak.

“The State of Israel will be based on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel” — and commits to “complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or sex.”

The founders did not reach for military might. Not for ethnic supremacy. Not even for simple survival. In their most solemn moment, they reached for the prophets. They staked this new state’s legitimacy on a moral vision — ancient, demanding, and unmistakably Jewish.

That is what Yom Ha’atzmaut is actually celebrating.

Not merely a military victory. Not a geopolitical fact. The moment a people declared they would return to their land and do so justly.

The Tradition They Invoked

They knew exactly which prophets they were citing.

Isaiah, who thundered that sacrifice without justice is an abomination. Amos, who declared that God despises our festivals when the poor are crushed at the gates. Micah, who distilled the entire Torah into three obligations: do justice, love kindness, walk humbly.

These were not gentle voices. They were Israel’s most demanding lovers, celebrating the covenant and indicting its betrayal in the same breath, sometimes even in the same verse. They never abandoned Israel when it failed. They held it, fiercely, to its highest self.

That is the tradition Yom Ha’atzmaut places us in.

Not cheerleading. Not abandonment. Something harder and more honorable than either: prophetic loyalty.

The prophets never argued that Israel’s struggles forfeited its right to exist. Nor did they suggest that Israel’s existence placed it beyond accountability. They said something more demanding than either: precisely because this people is called to something higher, the gap between that calling and the present reality must be named, mourned, and closed.

The Gap We Cannot Pretend Away

The Declaration is not a historical artifact. It is a living covenant — and covenants make demands.

So let me name what the Declaration’s own language requires us to ask.

There are wars that were both existential and necessary. Wars whose courage deserves to be honored without hesitation or qualification. And there are military and political choices whose necessity is genuinely disputed — whose costs have fallen heavily on people who did not choose them.

There is an occupation now entering its sixth decade. The Declaration promised equality and justice. For millions of people who have known nothing else, the daily reality of life without sovereignty or legal recourse is a standing question addressed directly to the founders’ vision.

There is violence carried out by those who claim the land in the name of Jewish values — desecrating both the land and those values in the same act.

And there is a sustained assault on judicial independence — the very institution standing between the state’s founding promises and their erosion. When accountability is dismantled, the gap between aspiration and reality stops being painful and becomes permanent.

I am not making a partisan argument. I am holding the present up to the Declaration’s own words.

To name these things is not to delegitimize Israel. It is to hold Israel to its own founding covenant.

That is, in fact, the most Jewish act we can take.

What the Rabbis Already Knew

Jewish tradition has already given us a framework for exactly this kind of complexity.

On the last days of Passover, we recite only half Hallel — the psalms of praise — rather than the full Hallel.

The reason is arresting.

When the angels wanted to sing as the Egyptians drowned in the sea, God stopped them. “My creatures are drowning, and you want to sing songs?” According to tradition, full joy is morally unavailable when others are suffering, even when that suffering follows from our own necessary deliverance.

Yom Ha’atzmaut does not call for half Hallel. The miracle of Jewish sovereignty — a people returning from the literal ashes of history to reestablish a state in their ancestral homeland — is real, extraordinary, and worthy of full-throated celebration.

But perhaps not a Hallel entirely untroubled, either.

Not because the miracle is diminished. Because the vision the founders declared is not yet fully realized, and people are suffering in the shadow of that gap.

This is not despair. This is Jewish moral honesty.

The refusal to let celebration become anesthesia.

The Most Counter-Intuitive Thing I Want to Say

To celebrate Yom Ha’atzmaut is not to endorse the present.

It is to hold the present accountable to the founding promise.

When we gather, sing, and mark this day, we are not saying: everything is fine. We are saying: this vision is worth everything, but it is not yet complete. We are not done, and we refuse to walk away.

To stop celebrating is to abandon the field, to concede that the gap between aspiration and reality is simply how things are.

To celebrate without reckoning is to betray the vision and to turn a covenant into a tribal rally.

The prophetic answer, the Jewish answer, is to do both, fully, in the same breath.

Sing because the miracle is real.

Grieve because the distance from the vision is real.

Reject the false choice between love and conscience, because genuine love has never required us to close our eyes.

The prophets did not love Israel less for naming its failures. They loved it more, precisely because they refused to let it become less than it was called to be.

An Invitation

This Yom Ha’atzmaut, let your celebration be the most serious thing you do.

Sing — because seventy-seven years ago, a people who had just walked through fire stood up and declared they would live, build, and do so with justice. That deserves every note.

Grieve — because the distance between that declaration and today’s reality is not minor, and pretending otherwise dishonors the founders and those living in the shadow of that gap.

And then sit with this question, not as rhetoric but as a real question I am asking you directly:

What does my love for this state truly require of me?

Not what it permits. Not what it excuses.

What does it require?

That question — taken seriously and wrestled with honestly — may be the most Zionist act of all.

חַג עַצמָאוּת שָּמֵאח

A meaningful and searching Independence Day.

What Does It Mean to Truly Heal? Parshat Tazria-Metzora

What Does It Mean to Truly Heal?

Think of the last time you heard your name mentioned in a conversation that stopped the moment you walked in. That sudden silence — the awkward smiles, the quick subject change — carries a weight that is hard to name but impossible to forget. Most of us have been on both sides of that moment. We know how it feels to be the one walking in. If we are honest, we can recall times when we were the ones who went quiet.

Parshat Tazria-Metzora confronts us with one of the Torah’s most unsettling teachings: our words leave a mark on the world — and on ourselves. The rabbis understood tzara’at not as a mere physical affliction, often mistranslated as leprosy, but as an outward sign of an inward fracture, the consequence of lashon hara, speech that wounds. The Chofetz Chaim, R. Yisrael Meir Kagan, whose life’s work on the ethics of speech grew from this very parsha, took this so seriously that he would lose sleep over a careless word he himself had spoken. Not someone else’s words — his own. That level of accountability feels almost foreign to us today, in a world where harmful speech is effortless and its consequences are rarely felt by the speaker.

Most of us can recall a comment we made that traveled further than we intended — a remark at the dinner table, a message in a group chat, or a confidence shared just once that somehow became common knowledge. We told ourselves it was nothing. The Torah tells us otherwise.

But this parsha does not leave us in guilt. It offers us a path forward. Rabbi Jonathan Sacks taught that the metzora’s —the afflicted person ’s—journey was the Torah’s model of restorative justice—not punishment, but the purposeful work of healing and return. The community does not forget those who have been excluded. It waits for them, and welcomes them back.

That same path is open to us. This week, consider one conversation you might repair, one word you might withhold, and one silence you might choose when careless speech would have come easily.

“Mavet v’chayyim b’yad halashon”

“Death and life are in the power of the tongue” — Proverbs 18:21

The Torah is not asking us to be perfect. It is asking us to be honest — and then, one word at a time, to begin again.

Building a Sanctuary in the Shadows: Vayakhel-Pekudei

Building a Sanctuary in the Shadows: Vayakhel-Pekudei

In the double parashah of Vayakhel-Pekudei, we conclude the Book of Exodus not with a thunderous miracle but with a detailed account of gold, silver, and blue wool. After the spiritual collapse of the Golden Calf, the Jewish people are tasked with a “rebound” project: building the Mishkan (Tabernacle). But why create a sanctuary in the desert wilderness? Perhaps A more timely reframing of the question is, when the outside world is in chaos, how do we create an internal space that remains untouchable?

The word Vayakhel means “And he assembled.” Moses gathers the community together. This isn’t just a physical gathering; it is a spiritual reunification. After a period of division and sin, the remedy is collective purpose.

Pekudei means “records” or “accounts.” Moses gives a clear breakdown of every shekel donated.

Rashi, commenting on Exodus 35:2, explains that the commandment for Shabbat is placed directly before the construction of the Mishkan to teach us a boundary: as sacred and urgent as the “building” is, it does not take precedence over the Sabbath. Even during our most urgent moments of defense and advocacy, we must preserve the integrity of our holy pauses.

The Torah further admonishes in the next verse:

“You shall kindle no fire throughout your settlements on the day of the Sabbath.” (Exodus 35:3)

What is this fire of which the Torah speaks?  Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch, the founder of modern orthodoxy, explores this “fire” as the ultimate tool of human mastery and technology. The Torah’s prohibition against kindling fire on Shabbat reminds us that we must not be consumed by our own survival tools or ambitions. We fight when necessary, but we do not become the fight. We preserve our “Shabbat soul,” so we have a sanctuary to return to. The Human fire is different from the sacred fire of God’s presence in the Mishkan once it is built.

This highlights the tension we experience today: balancing our public responsibilities to the Jewish people while safeguarding the private spiritual integrity of our own souls and homes. We are currently facing serious crises. The external threats from Hamas, Iran, and others are existential and seek to destroy the Jewish state. Meanwhile, the rise of antisemitism and violence here and around the world presents significant risks to Jews and Jewish communities. Strengthening internal unity and security is essential. And so many of us are struggling in a world that does not give us the spiritual and emotional support we need.

This struggle for balance is our challenge today. Many of us lack a space for spiritual and emotional rest. The Mishkan, or sanctuary, feels elusive. Many of us are disconnected from traditional places of connection like synagogues. Yet we still long for what such places offer—community, support, and connections. If we don’t have these things that may complete us, how do we build the relationships at the core of a meaningful life? Can we be our best version of a friend, child, or sibling without that fulfillment? And how do we nurture our children, teaching them to be prepared, confident, and strong to face the world that awaits them?

Our task is to ensure that as they prepare to enter the world as strong, confident Jewish adults, they aren’t just experts in their fields, but are “wise-hearted” (Chacham Lev). It is in the home and in our relationships where that heart is fortified. Our home is a sanctuary that protects them from the “fire” of hostility, enabling them to focus on the “work” of becoming who they are meant to be.

The Book of Exodus concludes with the Cloud of Glory filling the Tabernacle during the day and aglow with fire by night.

In Exodus 40:38, we see, ‘The cloud of the Lord was upon the Tabernacle by day, and there was fire within it by night, before the eyes of the entire House of Israel throughout their journeys.”

The phrase “throughout their journeys” is essential. The cloud didn’t just appear when they were safe; it was present during the trekking, the uncertainty, and the transitions.

As we face current challenges both here and abroad, we remember that the “Accounting” of the Jewish people isn’t measured by our enemies’ hatred but by our own ability to build. By maintaining ourselves and the sanctuary that is our home, we create a space that guides and nurtures both ourselves and our loved ones with their own “fire and cloud.” We help ensure that we are fortified, and when it is time for our children to venture out on their own, they carry a piece of that sanctuary within them, ready to lead with strength, pride, and a “wise heart.”

 

 

 

Shabbat Shalom

I find myself drawn to the folk music and protest songs of an earlier tumultuous time in this nation’s history and some of the current balladeers singing about the need for justice in a time of injustice.

As Black History month draws to a close, and the work of civil rights seems more urgent than ever, I wanted to welcome Shabbat with Teach Your Children, the classic from Crosby Stills and Nash.

Wishing everyone Shabbat Shalom

Parshat Tetzaveh-Responsible Governing for the People

Parshat Tetzaveh marks a pivotal shift in the wilderness narrative of the Jewish people. While previous portions focused on the physical Tabernacle, Tetzaveh focuses on the human element: the inauguration of the Kohanim (priests). By establishing this dedicated class, the Torah ensures a disciplined bridge between the Divine Presence and B’nei Israel.

The transition from building structures to preparing “human vessels” reminds us that even the holiest space requires empathetic leadership to come to life. The priesthood was not an elite social hierarchy but a role of “functional holiness.” In Exodus 28:1, God commands Moses to “bring near” Aaron and his sons to serve, separating them to manage the meticulous maintenance of the Mishkan, which the general population could not sustain.

The priestly garments are a physical manifestation of this duty. The Choshen (Breastplate) bore the names of the twelve tribes, ensuring that the Kohen Gadol (High Priest) literally carried the nation’s weight “on his heart” (Exodus 28:29). This teaches that a leader’s primary function is representation and empathy, not merely ritual performance.

Faithfulness among the Kohanim was measured by adherence to strict protocols. The Milu’im (consecration process) involved smearing blood on the right ear, thumb, and big toe (Exodus 29:20), symbolizing a total commitment to:

  • Hearing: Attuning oneself to Divine instruction.
  • Action: Performing service with precision.
  • Movement: Walking a righteous path.

The Ner Tamid (Eternal Flame) serves as the ultimate metaphor for this duty. Commanded to kindle the lamps “from evening to morning” (Exodus 27:21), the priests maintained a consistency that transcended personal fatigue. Their faithfulness was embodied in the Tamid—the “always.”

The discipline required to keep the light burning is a powerful metaphor for contemporary society. Capricious or arbitrary leadership undermines the sacred role of those dedicated to preserving institutions. Just as the Kohanim served the Mishkan, today’s dedicated bureaucrats and elected leaders play a critical role in upholding the rule of law.

Long before democracy took its modern form, our tradition recognized that power is a sacred responsibility to the people. This value remains central to the rule of law and equal protection. Like the Kohanim, we are entrusted with preserving these “eternal flames” for generations to come.

 

Terumah-Power to the People

In Parshat Terumah, the transition from Sinai’s abstract thunder to the Mishkan‘s detailed blueprints offers the ultimate master class in institution-building. It suggests that while revelation provides the “why,” the institution provides the “how”—transforming a fleeting spiritual moment into a sustainable communal reality.

At Sinai, the relationship with the Divine was a “top-down” event—overwhelming and temporary. In Terumah, this is reversed by the command: “And let them make Me a sanctuary, that I may dwell among them” (Exodus 25:8). The shift here is profound, creating sustainability. Inspiration was found at Sinai. It is a spark; an institution becomes the hearth that keeps the fire burning. The text then speaks of a dwelling, with an interesting word choice: it doesn’t say God will dwell in it (the building), but among them (the people). The institution is not the goal; it is the vessel that allows the communal presence to persist. The idea is further elucidated as the focus shifts to the people’s action.

The word Terumah means “to lift up” or “set aside.” Crucially, the materials for the sanctuary were not collected through a flat tax but from “every person whose heart prompts them to give.” This reveals two core principles of healthy institutions. The first is shared ownership; when people contribute their own “gold, silver, and copper,” they are no longer spectators; they are stakeholders. The second is the diversity of people’s contributions. The Mishkan required everything from precious metals to goat hair. This teaches that an institution is only robust when it integrates the varying capacities of its members—from the wealthy benefactor to the skilled artisan.

This Parsha is known for its precise measurements—cubits of gold, rings of silver, and specific wood types. These details serve a vital purpose. They instill discipline and consistency. Without a structured “sanctuary,” collective energy dissipates. The Mishkan’s physical boundaries protected the sanctity of the community’s mission. This consistency ensured that the institution’s values of justice and holiness weren’t subject to the leader’s capricious mood or the crowd’s whims, but were anchored in a permanent, repeatable structure.

Our times test our understanding of what it means to live in community, bound together by the rule of law, freedom, dignity, and respect for all people. We need each other, and together we are stronger and less susceptible to those impulses. To ensure our country and its institutions endure, we must give of ourselves, investing in its care and championing the values at our core.

 

 

Remembering the Rev. Jesse Jackson

We mourn the death of Reverend Jesse Jackson. Jackson was a complex individual and a person of great accomplishment.

In this world of purity litmus tests, cancel culture, and identity politics, it is easy for some to write off this icon of the civil rights movement, focusing on shortcomings and missteps rather than accomplishments.

He helped move the arc of justice forward.  We can and should remember him for all the good he did, and hopefully find space in our hearts, even though he, like all of us, had flaws.  Jackson fostered a sense of pride and self-esteem in those who struggled in a society determined to deny them, as captured in his well-known saying, “I am Somebody.”  Jesse Jackson was Somebody.

This is a moment to rededicate ourselves to the vision of respect and dignity for every person that Jackson preached.  The work is far from over, and it is ours to do.

May his memory be for a blessing.

Mishpatim and the Modern State

Ra'anan
Ra’Anan

In Parashat Mishpatim, we move from the heights of Sinai and the grand laws given by God to Moses to the granular details of civil law. The shift teaches that a righteous society is built not on abstract ideals but on the daily, impartial application of the Rule of Law.

Mishpatim introduces three pillars essential to our current struggles:

  • Resistance to Tribalism: Exodus 23:2 warns, “You shall not follow the multitude (the mighty) to do evil.” In an era of “mob justice,” strongman tactics, and polarized echo chambers, this mandate requires that truth must supersede the pressures of the crowd.
  • Absolute Impartiality: The text prohibits favoring the wealthy or the poor in judgment. Legitimacy and order collapse when the law is seen as a tool for the powerful or a shield for the ideologically aligned. The blindfolded Lady Justice proclaims that all should be treated equally under the law.
  • Protection of the Vulnerable: By repeatedly centering the “stranger,” the Torah insists that legal structures are only as strong as the protections they afford the marginalized. A society’s greatness is defined by how it protects its most vulnerable.

Our institutions are threatened as society’s trust in them erodes. Mishpatim reminds us that an orderly society is a deliberate choice, one that requires our involvement and confidence. Our future as a nation and world leader depends on upholding a system in which the rule of law anchors us against the storms of political passion